Gentle readers, can you help me? I just invented a brand new art form about which I am very excited. Check it out: this art form employs the interplay of two or more persons seen and heard live by an audience. As far as I’m aware there is no art form like it. Remember, it has to have more than one person because the interplay is key, because as a fool once said:
Dialogue breeds risk like flowers bloom scent, and risk is the fabric of theatre. Because two or more people on stage can never know with certainty what an other is about to do, no matter how many times they have done it before, the audience attends the action with a sense of the innate exposure. “Anything could happen, and we are in the same damned room with these agitated people.” Risk is not a by-product of drama. It is the main ingredient.
So what do I call my invention? Please do not say theatre. I have been told by experts that that word actually means:
- “Whatever takes place in a theater.”
- “...But also anything which takes place outside of a theatre but sorta feels like it could’ve taken place in a theatre.”
- “...But also anything else I decide it is.”
I’m collecting suggestions below, most especially from non-theatre artists and non-academics, because I am really hoping to convince you to come see my new art form.
Thanks in advance!
I think you should call it Steve.
I've always liked that name.
Posted by: Matthew Sweeney00 | 05/18/2011 at 11:13 AM
Thanks, Matt. Yours is the first suggestion and shall be granted all the privileges of precedence.
Posted by: Paul Mullin | 05/18/2011 at 11:18 AM
Solaboration.
Posted by: Christopher Lucas | 05/18/2011 at 11:28 AM
I'm intrigued, Chris, but I'll need a little more sales if it's too push "Steve" from the podium.
Posted by: Paul Mullin | 05/18/2011 at 11:54 AM
Paul, what you're describing sounds a lot like sex.
Posted by: Scot Augustson | 05/18/2011 at 01:12 PM
I think you already said it: Interplay.
Come experience the new interplay by Paul Mullin.
Posted by: Sara Stapleton | 05/18/2011 at 01:13 PM
Funny you should mention that, Scot, because—can you believe it?— I thought of that too. And then I thought, “Now wait a minute, Paulie. You of all people know that sex can be a one-person operation.” So then I remembered what we call it between two or more: "sexual intercourse."
So, are you suggesting, Dr. Augustson, as a possible candidate “theatrical intercourse”? No need to answer. I’m going to assume you are and give you a prize if it’s the ultimate winner.
Posted by: Paul Mullin | 05/18/2011 at 01:31 PM
It should be called life! For some it is what they wish it to be and others it is.
Posted by: C.a. | 05/18/2011 at 01:33 PM
Why not just call it "intercourse"? Seriously. I think that works pretty well.
Posted by: Jeremy M. Barker | 05/18/2011 at 01:40 PM
inter-
a prefix occurring in loanwords from Latin, where it meant “between,” “among,” “in the midst of,” “mutually,” “reciprocally,” “together,” “during” ( intercept; interest ); on this model, used in the formation of compound words ( intercom; interdepartmental ).
course-
–noun
1. a direction or route taken or to be taken.
2. the path, route, or channel along which anything moves: the course of a stream.
3. advance or progression in a particular direction; forward or onward movement.
Posted by: Jeremy M. Barker | 05/18/2011 at 01:41 PM
Intercourse is so...librarian. Sort of like the word "Behoove." If the point is to not further drive people away from the theater, how about Clusterfuck?
Posted by: Scot Augustson | 05/18/2011 at 01:47 PM
Jeremy, your argument is compelling.
Imagine how much more often we'll hear things like:
"Man, I can't stop thinking about the intercourse last night."
"Honey, how 'bout going to see Mike Daisey tonight?" "No thanks, I really prefer intercourse."
"Paul, what's your dream job?" "Oh, you know, if I could just get a living wage to sit around and dream new ways of performing intercourse, I'd be happy."
Bottom line, Barker: you're running strong in this.
Posted by: Paul Mullin | 05/18/2011 at 01:48 PM
Liveform, Sentintercourse
Posted by: Ed Mullin | 05/18/2011 at 02:34 PM
Thanks, Eddie! I do believe you are the first non-theatre person (i.e. performer,professional, or critic) to submit, and thus your submissions will be weighted more heavily.
Posted by: Paul Mullin | 05/18/2011 at 02:41 PM
How about boxing?
or Couples figure skating
or just sports? can we call it sports?
also Can you help me with a word for my solo saxophone project? I feel like since I'm the only one doing it I can't call it music so I need something else to call it.
Posted by: noah | 05/18/2011 at 05:02 PM
If what I've been seeing over the last few years is any indication, the term you may be looking for is Artistic Prostitution.
Posted by: Gomez | 05/18/2011 at 06:42 PM
Paul, I'm telling you: not only does it work, but it makes for far more entertaining double-entendres.
Posted by: Jeremy M. Barker | 05/19/2011 at 08:01 AM